RESEARCH

AI agents hijacked, memory sandboxes broken and side channels on implementations

Nov 15, 2026 · Updated Nov 15, 2026 · 4 min read

OT and industrial securitySupply chain

A large conference's proceedings inflate the counts, so the jumps should be read with caution. The content is strong on AI agents (hijacking Android GUI agents, defenses for LLM ones), on defeating memory protections (V8 sandbox, kernel MTE) and on side channels in cryptographic implementations and TEEs.

This week's trends

AI & LLM Security · Steady

99 papers this week · average of the previous 4 weeks: 89.5

The count is near the average (99 versus 89.5), but the content clusters on agents and LLMs. One attack hijacks Android GUI agents by exploiting the gap between observation and action; other work proposes defenses against prompt injection, harmful reinforcement-learning fine-tuning and poisoning of code-generation models. For insurers, AI agents on corporate devices open vectors that usual controls miss.

Papers cited:

Systems & Software Security · Rising

60 papers this week · average of the previous 4 weeks: 12.0

The count rises to 60 against a 12 average: much of this is a large conference's proceedings landing, so read the jump with caution. The content, though, is strong on defeating memory protections: a fuzzer breaks the V8 JavaScript engine sandbox, other work bypasses ARM kernel asynchronous MTE with ordinary corruption bugs, and an LLM agent generates proof-of-vulnerability inputs in minutes. For insurers, defenses presented as robust fall to now-public techniques.

Papers cited:

Post-Quantum Cryptography · Rising

57 papers this week · average of the previous 4 weeks: 23.8

Post-quantum papers rise to 57 against a 23.8 average, partly from conference proceedings. The most concrete thread is implementations: a non-profiled attack recovers the ML-DSA key with few traces, another shows that Falcon's square-root computations create vulnerabilities. Threshold signatures and post-quantum key recovery also appear. For insurers, the security of standard schemes depends on how they are implemented on devices.

Papers cited:

Hardware & Side Channels · Rising

44 papers this week · average of the previous 4 weeks: 8.2

The count rises to 44 against an 8.2 average, lifted by conference proceedings. The work looks at side channels on implementations: a non-profiled analysis recovers the ML-DSA key with few traces, another refines compression side-channel techniques, a third fingerprints Wasm applications inside a TEE from file-system interactions. For insurers, security depends on how standard schemes are implemented, not only on their choice.

Papers cited:

Identity & Authentication · Rising

52 papers this week · average of the previous 4 weeks: 10.2

The count rises to 52 against a 10.2 average, largely from conference proceedings. The work looks at real-world authentication: new OAuth login abuses in super-app mini-programs, detection of firmware authentication bypass from initial credentials, and password inference from smart-glasses video. For insurers, access controls taken as given can be bypassed in ways standard questionnaires miss.

Papers cited:


How this digest is made

New papers are collected every day and selected every week from arXiv, the IACR ePrint archive and the main security conferences and journals (IEEE S&P, USENIX Security, ACM CCS, NDSS, CRYPTO, PoPETs, IEEE TIFS and others). A score based on source, topic and early signals picks the candidates; an AI model assesses them and writes the summaries. Summaries are based on the abstracts: the original paper is the reference for details.

New papers assessed for this edition: 920.

Back to Research